<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title> - Ohne pax americana</title>
<link>http://www.amerikanski-forum.de/forum/</link>
<description>Das offizielle Amerikanski Forum</description>
<language>de</language>
<item>
<title>Ohne pax americana</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bei der Diskussion um den Irakkrieg sieht es meist <br />
so aus, als stünde der Nahe Osten vor der <br />
Alterntive: amerikanische Hegemonie oder <br />
Selbstbestimmung (bzw. indigene Diktatur). Ich <br />
frage mich, wie realistisch diese Vision ist <br />
angesichts der Vehemenz, mit der Russland seine <br />
Interessen in dieser Region vertritt: <br />
--------------------------------------- <br />
Unraveling Iran´s Nuclear Secrets <br />
 <br />
(...) As far as outsiders can tell, Iran´s nuclear <br />
program is not nearly as advanced as North <br />
Korea´s. But a concerted international effort is <br />
urgently needed to keep it from progressing <br />
further.(...) Even intrusive inspections cannot <br />
keep a determined nation from playing games of <br />
hide-and-seek with the atomic energy agency. <br />
Inspections must be backed up by strict policies <br />
limiting the export of nuclear material and <br />
technologies.  <br />
 <br />
** The Bush administration´s response has so far <br />
been sensible. It is encouraging the International <br />
Atomic Energy Agency to press Iran for more <br />
details and more intrusive inspections. And it has <br />
intensified its efforts to persuade Russia to stop <br />
selling nuclear reactors and technology to Iran. <br />
Tehran´s secret enrichment activities belie <br />
Russian assurances that this nuclear deal will not <br />
increase proliferation risks. ** <br />
 <br />
** Russia, in particular, needs to pull back from <br />
its unwise nuclear cooperation deal with Iran. The <br />
civilian reactor being built with Russian help at <br />
Bushehr could go into operation later this year. <br />
** <br />
 <br />
 <br />
Washington reasonably fears that plutonium <br />
produced by this reactor could be diverted to a <br />
secret weapons program, even though Moscow expects <br />
the spent fuel to be returned to Russia. It also <br />
worries, rightly, about the nuclear weapons skills <br />
Iranian scientists may pick up from their Russian <br />
counterparts. If Moscow is unwilling to cancel the <br />
deal outright, it should at least freeze it until <br />
Iran accepts strengthened I.A.E.A. inspections. <br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/09/opinion/09FRI2.h">http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/09/opinion/09FRI2.h</a><br />
tml <br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.amerikanski-forum.de/forum/index.php?id=934</link>
<guid>http://www.amerikanski-forum.de/forum/index.php?id=934</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smadar</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
